The City of Chicago recently updated its existing “Ban the Box” Ordinance to further limit an employer’s ability to consider conviction records of both new and current employees.  With the new amendments, employers covered by the Ordinance who wish to review conviction records must engage in an individualized assessment, provide pre-adverse and final adverse action notices, and include additional language to the notices regarding the right to file a claim.

Under the Ordinance, Chicago employers are prohibited from using a person’s conviction record as a basis for, among other things, refusing to hire, promote, discharge or discipline, unless (i) there is a substantial relationship between one or more of the criminal offenses in the conviction record and the employment sought or held, (ii) the granting or continuation of employment would involve an unreasonable risk to property or to the safety or welfare of specific individuals or the general public, or (iii) the use of the conviction record is otherwise authorized by law. 

The prior version of the Ordinance largely mirrored the state’s Job Opportunities for Qualified Applicants Act, which generally set forth that an employer or employment agency may not inquire about or into, consider, or require disclosure of the criminal record or criminal history of an applicant until the applicant has been determined qualified for the position and notified that the applicant has been selected for an interview by the employer or employment agency.  If there is no interview, the employer cannot consider this information until after a conditional offer of employment is made to the applicant by the employer or employment agency.  

The revised provisions nearly match those set forth in the Illinois Human Rights Act (“IHRA”), 775 ILCS 5/2-103.1(A), but there are key differences for Chicago employers to consider.

First, employers not otherwise covered by the IHRA may be covered by the Chicago requirements.  The revised Chicago Ordinance covers all employers that (i) are subject to Chicago’s licensing requirements, or (ii) maintain a business facility within the geographic boundaries of Chicago.  This definition of “employer” differs from that in the parallel IHRA provision, which covers any employer employing “one or more employees within Illinois during 20 or more calendar weeks within the calendar year of or preceding the alleged violation.”  775 ILCS 5/2-101(B). 

Second, covered employers who make a final decision to disqualify or take an adverse action against an employee or applicant based at least in part on the individual’s conviction record must notify the individual of the right to file a complaint with the Chicago Commission on Human Relations.  The parallel IHRA provision requires the employer to provide a similar notice that references the employee’s right to file a charge with the Illinois Department of Human Rights (“IDHR”).  Chicago employers covered by both laws will now need to reference both the complaint filing rights at the Chicago Commission and charge filing rights with the IDHR.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Elizabeth N. Hall Elizabeth N. Hall

Elizabeth N. Hall is a Shareholder in the firm’s Labor and Employment practice area and serves as the Chicago office chair of the firm’s women’s affinity group, “Women at Vedder Empowering Success” (WAVES).

Ms. Hall represents a wide range of employers before state

Elizabeth N. Hall is a Shareholder in the firm’s Labor and Employment practice area and serves as the Chicago office chair of the firm’s women’s affinity group, “Women at Vedder Empowering Success” (WAVES).

Ms. Hall represents a wide range of employers before state and federal courts and administrative agencies, as well as in arbitral forums, defending them against various claims, including single plaintiff and class allegations of employment discrimination, failure to accommodate disabilities, sexual harassment, wrongful and retaliatory discharge, breach of contract and violations of the FMLA and wage and hour laws. Ms. Hall has successfully argued procedural and employment discrimination issues in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and has particular expertise in managing electronic discovery teams in complex litigation.

A significant portion of Ms. Hall’s daily practice involves providing practical advice to employers regarding risk management; effective employee discipline and discharge; conducting workplace investigations; accommodating disabilities and pregnancy; workplace violence; managing leaves of absence and complying with FMLA and state leave requirements; workforce reductions; drafting and reviewing employment, recruitment and staffing agreements; policy and handbook development; wage and hour compliance; and state and federal employment laws. She frequently trains clients and employer groups on many of these topics.  Ms. Hall also has extensive experience drafting and negotiating severance, settlement and conciliation agreements on behalf of employer clients.

In 2017 and 2018, Ms. Hall was recommended by The Legal 500 United States for the Labor and Employment Disputes (including collective actions): Defense category. In 2018, she was named to the Crain’s Custom Media “Chicago Notable Women Lawyers” list. She also was selected as an Emerging Lawyer, an affiliate of Leading Lawyers, from 2015 to 2019. From 2010 to 2015, Ms. Hall was selected for inclusion as an Illinois Rising Star, and Super Lawyers named her one of the “Top Women Attorneys in Illinois” in the “Rising Star” category in 2013 and 2014.